Chapter 7 - Exonerations

 

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
— Martin Luther King Jr.

 

Introduction

​

Wrongful convictions in unexplained infant and early child deaths, especially those involving allegations of abuse or shaken baby syndrome (SBS), continue to devastate families and damage the credibility of both legal and medical systems. The following cases illustrate not only the forensic and prosecutorial errors that drive these tragedies but also the lived reality of the innocent men and women whose lives—and families—were destroyed.

 

The Registry of Exonerations: Overview

​

As of 2025, there are 84 documented cases in the author’s private register of exonerations for the death of a baby or child up to two years old, spanning 70 US, 5 UK, 5 Canadian, 2 Australian, 1 Japanese, and 1 Swedish cases. Details of the 84 cases can be obtained from the author.

​

Of these, 33 were women (mean at conviction age 28 years), and 52 were men (mean age at conviction 25 years), and 28% of females and 13% of males were non-parental carers. The children who died were nearly evenly split between sexes, and the mean age at death was 32 weeks.

​

Two women and five men were sentenced to death (exonerated after a mean of 16 years in prison); 15 women and 11 men were given life sentences (average 9 years served); the remaining exonerated defendants served an average of 14 years. The mean time in prison before exoneration for the whole 84 cases was 8 years.

​

Prior pathology included:

• Recent falls: 21 cases

• Prior cerebral pathology (seizure/intracranial bleeding): 9

• Blood disorders: 4 (3 with clotting disorder, 1 with sickle cell anemia)

• Severe vitamin deficiencies: 2

• Congenital renal sepsis: 1

• Sepsis: 2

• Metabolic disorder: multiple cases where later genetic or metabolic testing revealed underlying disease.

 

Case Histories

​

Vincent Benavides

​

For 25 years, Vincent Benavides—a Mexican immigrant with intellectual disabilities—languished on death row in California’s San Quentin prison.³ In 1991, while caring for his girlfriend’s toddler daughter, Consuelo, he discovered her unresponsive and bleeding near a carport. The hospital documented severe internal injuries: duodenum, pancreas, and bowel split, and multiple failed attempts to catheterize her.³ At autopsy, a pathologist with a history of professional misconduct claimed her abdominal injuries were caused by vaginal and anal rape—contradicted by anatomical knowledge and the witnessing staff, who had induced the trauma in the pelvic region during repeated attempts to catheterize her.

​

Vincent was convicted on evidence that also included coerced and, at times, recanted witness testimony and lab findings (dirt and grass on Consuelo’s clothes and shoes) ignored by the court.³ Despite compelling new expert opinions and multiple medical recantations, Vincent remained in prison for over a decade after the evidence—both medical and circumstantial—clearly exonerated him.³ Upon release in 2018, he had lost nearly half his life, with compensation unable to remediate years spent wrongly accused and imprisoned.

​

Sabrina Butler

​

Sabrina Butler—a vulnerable nineteen‑year‑old African American single mother—was the first woman in US history exonerated from death row. Raised in poverty by a single alcoholic mother, Sabrina’s adolescence was marked by struggle and resilience.

​

In 1989, Sabrina returned home from a short run to discover her infant, Walter, not breathing; she frantically sought help, but Walter could not be revived. In shock, Sabrina endured hours of accusatory, unrecorded police questioning and was manipulated into signing a false confession.

​

At trial, her lawyer—unfamiliar with criminal law and heavily intoxicated—called no expert witnesses. Critical medical records that showed that Walter had a rare genetic kidney disease, and that his injuries were consistent with desperate resuscitation, were not presented or disclosed to the pathologist. In addition, the prosecutor sequestered Sabrina’s neighbors so that they could not give evidence on her behalf and breached professional conduct rules by socializing with jurors during the trial.

​

Convicted by an all‑white, mostly male jury, Sabrina spent years in solitary confinement awaiting execution, separated from her surviving son and family.

​

 The death penalty abolitionist, Clive Stafford-Smith, took up her cause. After five‑and‑a‑half years of advocacy and a new trial, she was acquitted.

​

Following her release she received $329,000 compensation. Her experiences were detailed in the book Exonerated: The Sabrina Butler Story published in 2012. Showing remarkable resilience, she became a passionate advocate for the abolition of the death penalty and reform of the justice system.

​

She is currently the Assistant Director of Membership and Training for ‘Witness to Innocence.’ She is married, goes under the name of Butler-Smith, and lives with her husband and two children in Memphis, Tennessee.

​

Alan Yurko

​

Alan Yurko’s ordeal in Florida became an international cause célèbre. Convicted of murdering his ten‑week‑old son by shaking, Alan was sentenced to life in prison mainly on the testimony of Dr Shashi Gore, a state medical examiner.

​

Later, it emerged that Dr Gore had made numerous basic errors: reporting that the baby was black‑skinned when he was white, that his head circumference was 22 cm when it was at least 47.5 cm, describing microscopic heart findings on a heart that had been removed for transplant before the examination, and missing a fatal infectious meningitis.

​

Despite unambiguous evidence of wrongful conviction and calls from international experts to overturn the verdict, Yurko endured years of incarceration before a judge recognized the forensic failings and ordered his release in 2004.

​

Yurko’s wife, Frances, campaigned fearlessly throughout; the psychological and material damage to their family, and to Alan personally, were incalculable and not undone.

​

Dr Shashi Gore was formally barred from performing autopsies by the Florida Medical Examiners Commission in June 2004.

 

Patricia Stallings

​

Patricia Stallings, a Missouri mother, was wrongfully convicted in 1991 of poisoning her infant son Ryan with ethylene glycol (antifreeze) after hospital laboratory tests reported metabolites that clinicians interpreted as classic for antifreeze ingestion. When she later gave birth in prison, her second baby, David Jr., developed identical biochemical abnormalities despite having had no contact with her, prompting metabolic specialists to re‑examine both children.

​

Specialist testing showed that David Jr. had methylmalonic acidemia (MMA), a rare inherited metabolic disorder in which organic acids accumulate in the blood and can be misidentified as ethylene glycol or related toxins by certain assays. Re‑analysis of Ryan’s stored samples revealed the same MMA pattern, proving that both children were affected by a genetic disease rather than poisoning and that the initial toxicology interpretation was fatally flawed.

​

Based on this new evidence, Stallings’s conviction was vacated, she was released after about two years in prison, and all charges were eventually dropped. She and her husband then brought civil actions against the hospital, physicians, and testing laboratory, leading to confidential but widely reported multi‑million‑dollar settlements for wrongful death and wrongful conviction.* The case has since become a paradigm example of how rare metabolic disorders can mimic poisoning and how misinterpreted laboratory results—combined with tunnel vision—can send an innocent parent to prison.

 

Shaken Baby Syndrome Convictions

​

Thirty-six of the 84 cases involved SBS convictions—frequently driven more by controversial interpretations of imaging and the absence of prior abuse reports than by direct evidence. Families were often torn apart by poorly substantiated accusations: confessions or plea deals were sometimes coerced by the threat of harsher punishment, and prosecutors or police pressured witnesses or concealed test results and medical reports. Even where evidence of, or expert consensus on, natural causes or accidental childhood trauma emerged, resistance to overturning convictions was high. Years often elapsed between proof of innocence and actual release.

​

Three individuals entered “Alford” pleas on legal advice, and two others pleaded guilty to lesser charges at appeal rather than risk continued incarceration despite exculpatory evidence. In an astonishing 31% of SBS convictions, one or more forms of official misconduct played a role, including:

​

• Prosecutor misconduct: 5 cases

• Withholding of exculpatory evidence: 6 cases

• Police officer misconduct: 2 cases

• Forensic analyst misconduct: 4 cases

• Witness tampering: 2 cases

• Child welfare misconduct: 1 case

• Perjury by an official: 1 case

• ​

 

Summary

 

These stories reveal that wrongful convictions in child death cases are not random aberrations: they are the predictable result of systemic failings in forensic standards, legal process, and institutional accountability. Families suffer irreparable harm. Science and justice both demand humility, vigilance, and reform. Innocence work—documenting, publicizing, and rectifying these tragedies—remains a public obligation for as long as such errors persist.

​

​

​

 

​